“Protests Against Sowore Is a Distraction from the Truth” — Soneye AbdulAzeez

“Protests Against Sowore Is a Distraction from the Truth” — Soneye AbdulAzeez

A protest held in Abuja targeting human rights activist and former presidential candidate Omoyele Sowore has drawn sharp criticism from various quarters, including educationist and human rights advocate Soneye AbdulAzeez, popularly known as LAS.

The protest, which appeared to be organized by a group of individuals alleging that Sowore is engaged in the blackmail of politicians, has raised concerns about the growing trend of sponsored demonstrations aimed at discrediting outspoken activists.

Reacting to the protest in a public statement, LAS condemned the gathering, describing it as a “sponsored attempt to malign a truth-teller.” He wrote:

“So some sponsored people gathered in Abuja to protest against Sowore claiming he is blackmailing politicians. Among many names are Saraki, Iweala, Obi. Saraki himself took Sowore to court and lost because Sowore has evidence of his corruption. Obi has refused to sue and the Pandora Papers are in the public. Iweala can’t do either. Nigerians, it is left for you to choose the right side to stand by.”

The activist referenced several high-profile figures allegedly mentioned during the protest, including former Senate President Bukola Saraki, former Minister of Finance and current WTO Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, and Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi. LAS noted that while Saraki once took legal action against Sowore, the case was unsuccessful, reportedly due to compelling evidence presented by the activist.

He also pointed to the Pandora Papers — a global investigation that exposed hidden offshore accounts and financial dealings of prominent individuals — as being in the public domain, implying that Obi and others have yet to challenge the allegations in court.

Sowore, the publisher of SaharaReporters, has long been a vocal critic of political corruption in Nigeria and has faced numerous legal battles and state-sanctioned crackdowns for his activism.

The protest and the reactions it has triggered has once again reveal the polarized political climate in Nigeria, where activists and whistleblowers often face intense pressure and coordinated campaigns aimed at undermining their credibility.

APC SUMMIT; A GATHERING OF FAILURES ENDORSING THE GRAND COMMANDER OF FAILURE (GCFR).

APC SUMMIT; A GATHERING OF FAILURES ENDORSING THE GRAND COMMANDER OF FAILURE (GCFR).

PRESS STATEMENT

APC SUMMIT; A GATHERING OF FAILURES ENDORSING THE GRAND COMMANDER OF FAILURE (GCFR).

Nigerians yesterday watched with utter disappointment the embarrassing gathering of failures in Abuja.

The APC Summit was a gross insult on the intelligence of Nigerians as the grand-failure, Bola Tinubu, was praised to the high heavens despite the untold hardship, mass poverty, and several neoliberal attacks the regime has launched against the people. One would only wonder if these men and women in APC really live in this space like the rest of us.

No one in Nigeria today needs a degree in Economics to understand the magnitude of hardship the policies of the regime have caused, as the economy falls off the cliff. Under this Naira devaluation and floating regime, the Naira is now so worthless than a used toilet paper. The Naira floats between 1500-1700 per dollar with many businesses that rely on Forex struggling while many have folded up already.

On security, violent attacks have become a daily occurrence, and all the promises to secure lives and properties have proven to be empty words. From the Plateau, to the Southeast, North down to the Southwest, no one can sleep with their eyes closed.

The rule of law has also suffered badly under this grand failure. Under the watch of the grand failure, the once revered judiciary has become an object of mockery. “Go to court” is now the popular innuendo when Nigerians want to express how disappointing and unreliable the justice system has become. This is without dwelling so much on the poor human rights record of the regime. Journalists and critics now live in fear of being arrested and charged under a wicked CyberCrime Act.

In spite of all these, the same political class that has crippled Nigeria continues to recycle itself under different banners. This is why Nigerians must divorce themselves from this crop of failed leaders and prepare to wrestle power through the revolutionary and people-oriented politics of the African Action Congress (AAC).

The so-called opposition under the Labour Party (LP), Social Democratic Party (SDP), and the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) should not be taken seriously. They are of the same identity: looters, opportunists, and defenders of the status quo who are only interested in switching positions, not changing the lives of ordinary people.

Nigeria needs a clear break from the old. That break will not come from summits of failures or alliances of the corrupt. It will come from the organized power of the people rising through genuine revolutionary platforms like the AAC.

We condemn the APC gathering of failures in its entirety, describing it as insensitive and irresponsible. We state that it’s time to reject deception. It’s time to build real change.

Signed:

Femi Adeyeye
National Publicity Secretary,
African Action Congress

23/5/2025

AAC Responds to Deji Adeyanju, Clarifies Meaning of Opposition

AAC Responds to Deji Adeyanju, Clarifies Meaning of Opposition

“Opposition is not being in another ‘shop’ with a different brand name. It’s about having opposing ideology and different policy direction,” he explained. “This was why APC after being ‘opposition’ came to power and continued what Jonathan was doing, in fact made it worse. There was no opposing idea.”

A debate over the nature and authenticity of political opposition in Nigeria has been reignited following comments made by human rights lawyer Deji Adeyanju and a firm rebuttal by the Publicity Secretary of the African Action Congress (AAC), Adeyeye Olorunfemi.

Deji Adeyanju had earlier taken to social media to comment on what he perceived as ongoing friction between Omoyele Sowore, former presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), and Peter Obi, former presidential candidate of the Labour Party.

Adeyanju lamented that “opposition should not be fighting opposition,” suggesting that a reconciliation should be brokered between the two figures. “I have tried to talk to Baba Sho [Sowore] in the past, but he said they are all thieves and that he cannot work with them,” Adeyanju stated, adding that “someone should be able to bring them to the table.”

In a detailed response, Adeyeye Olorunfemi questioned the very premise of Adeyanju’s statement, challenging what he described as a shallow understanding of the term “opposition.”

According to Olorunfemi, being in a different political party does not inherently make a politician an opposition figure. Rather, he argued, opposition must be defined by fundamentally different ideologies and policy directions.

“What exactly do you mean? Who are the ones in opposition?” Olorunfemi queried, noting that several high-profile politicians, including Peter Obi, Atiku Abubakar, and even Nasir El-Rufai, share the same policy stances as the ruling administration on critical issues.

He cited Obi’s support for the controversial naira redesign policy under former President Buhari, his alignment with President Tinubu on fuel subsidy removal, naira devaluation, defunding of social services, and privatization of national assets. Olorunfemi contended that these policy positions reveal a lack of ideological difference and undermine any claims of true opposition.

“Opposition is not being in another ‘shop’ with a different brand name. It’s about having opposing ideology and different policy direction,” he explained. “This was why APC after being ‘opposition’ came to power and continued what Jonathan was doing, in fact made it worse. There was no opposing idea.”

Reaffirming AAC’s stance, Olorunfemi emphasized that his party offers a clear and principled alternative to the ruling regime, advocating for social justice, public ownership of critical assets, and robust anti-corruption mechanisms.

The AAC spokesperson ended with a caution: “So please, when you use the word ‘opposition’, be guided.”

AAC Holds Hitch-Free LG Primaries in Lagos

AAC Holds Hitch-Free LG Primaries in Lagos

In an exclusive interview with the party’s Lagos State Chairman, Ayoyinka Oni, the AAC leader confirmed that the primary election held in the state proceeded smoothly, with no reports of irregularities or disputes.

The African Action Congress (AAC) has expressed satisfaction over the peaceful and transparent conduct of its local government primary election in Lagos State, describing the exercise as successful and encouraging for the party’s grassroots structure.

In an exclusive interview with the party’s Lagos State Chairman, Ayoyinka Oni, the AAC leader confirmed that the primary election held in the state proceeded smoothly, with no reports of irregularities or disputes.

“It went well as expected. It was a good experience for all and especially our new members,” Oni said. “We started the day with membership registration and renewal of the party card. Delegates were confirmed and registered. It was a straightforward primary since all contestants came unopposed.”

Oni attributed the seamless process to the party’s strategic preparation and commitment to internal democracy. According to him, “The secret is making sure the wards had perfected all their delegates before getting to the state. We confirmed their membership and then provided them with delegate tags before our primaries were conducted.”

He further revealed that any potential issues were proactively handled at the grassroots level, which contributed to the calm and orderliness observed during the primary.

“No report of irregularities,” Oni stated. “All members that became candidates yesterday were screened by their local government areas even before they got to the state. Whatever issues must have been settled at the local government level before the day of the primary. We had a smooth process.”

With the successful completion of the primaries, the AAC is now shifting focus to the campaign phase. “We look forward to the campaign as we tell our people to vote for our great party at local government areas,” Oni concluded.

Party members have also expressed satisfaction with the conduct of the primary election, with many sending congratulatory messages to the candidates. One of the party members, Hungbeme Moses Wanayon, wrote in a statement:

“Congratulations to all leaders and candidates for a successful Lagos AAC primary election. Now the real work is on us all. We must go out there to campaign rigorously, both online and within our communities. E ma sun!

AAC, Take it Back. Action.

RevolutionNow”

AAC Slams INEC Over CVR Confusion, Questions Capacity to Conduct Credible 2026 Council Elections

AAC Slams INEC Over CVR Confusion, Questions Capacity to Conduct Credible 2026 Council Elections

The Federal Capital Territory (FCT) chapter of the African Action Congress (AAC) has strongly criticised the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for its apparent lack of preparation for the upcoming FCT Area Council elections, scheduled for February 26, 2026.

In a joint statement signed by the FCT AAC Chairman, Agena Robert Ande , and Organising Secretary, Sydney Usman Godwin, the party expressed deep disappointment over INEC’s failure to provide clear guidance on the resumption of the Continuous Voter Registration (CVR) exercise.

The AAC FCT warned that thousands of young Nigerians who recently turned 18 could be denied their right to vote unless voter registration resumes promptly and electoral procedures are clarified.

The party also criticised INEC over confusion surrounding the CVR restart. While there were initial reports that registration would resume on May 27, the commission later denied the information, causing public uncertainty. The AAC described the mixed signals as evidence of poor planning, which could undermine the credibility of the 2026 elections in the FCT.

“The African Action Congress (AAC) FCT chapter expresses profound concern and disappointment over the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) egregious lack of preparedness for the forthcoming Federal Capital Territory (FCT) elections,” the statement read.

“It is unacceptable that tens of thousands of eligible voters, especially newly eligible young Nigerians, face the risk of disenfranchisement due to the commission’s failure to resume CVR and facilitate voter participation,” the party said.

The AAC FCT issued several demands to INEC, including:

The immediate announcement of a clear and fixed date for the resumption of Continuous Voter Registration.

Prompt production and distribution of Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) to all eligible registrants.

Acceleration of the voter transfer and update processes to avoid unnecessary disenfranchisement.

The party called on INEC to act decisively and transparently to safeguard the democratic rights of all eligible voters in the FCT.

“We urge INEC to rise to the occasion and prove its commitment to democratic principles. The AAC FCT chapter will continue to monitor developments closely and will not hesitate to take necessary actions to defend the rights of our members and the wider electorate,” the statement concluded.

AAC, ZLP, YPP, Others Protest LASIEC’s Charges for Local Council Election Participation

AAC, ZLP, YPP, Others Protest LASIEC’s Charges for Local Council Election Participation

A coalition of political parties under the Inter-Party Advisory Council (IPAC) in Lagos State has called on the Lagos State Independent Electoral Commission (LASIEC) to scrap administrative charges imposed on candidates contesting in the upcoming local government elections slated for July 12.

The protest was led by five political parties—Zenith Labour Party (ZLP), African Action Congress (AAC), Young Progressives Party (YPP), All People’s Party (APP), and Accord Party—whose representatives staged a peaceful march to the LASIEC office on Monday, demanding the immediate suspension of the fees or face legal consequences.

According to LASIEC’s election guidelines, candidates are required to pay administrative fees of N150,000 for chairmanship aspirants, N75,000 for vice-chairmanship, and N50,000 for councillorship. However, female candidates and persons with disabilities are exempted. The payments are to be made into any Nigerian bank using a designated revenue code (33101) and agency code (77095) in favor of the Lagos State Government.

The protesting party leaders criticized the fees as unconstitutional and a barrier to political participation. Speaking on behalf of the group, Adekunle Mode-Adenipebi, Lagos State Chairman of ZLP and IPAC Organising Secretary, argued that LASIEC’s mandate is to conduct elections, not to generate revenue for the government.

“LASIEC is not a revenue-generating body. These fees are unjust and unconstitutional. Similar charges were abolished in recent local council elections in Ogun and Oyo states. We demand the immediate withdrawal of these levies,” Mode-Adenipebi stated.

He also compared LASIEC’s actions to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which does not impose such fees on aspirants contesting higher offices, including the presidency and National Assembly.

According to Mode-Adenipebi, political parties may impose charges internally, but it is inappropriate for an electoral body to do so, as it risks disenfranchising aspiring candidates, especially those with limited financial resources.

Echoing this concern, Dele Oladeji, Chairman of the Accord Party in Lagos, warned that many aspirants may be forced out of the race due to financial constraints. “LASIEC is asking for what many candidates simply cannot afford. If the commission does not reverse this, we will seek redress in court by Wednesday,” he said.

Other party leaders, including Abiola Adeyemi (APP), Ayoyinka Oni (AAC), and former IPAC Chairman Olusegun Mobolaji (YPP), also condemned the charges as undemocratic and exclusionary.

The demonstration began at Birrel Avenue in Sabo-Yaba and concluded at LASIEC’s premises. Despite the peaceful nature of the protest, no LASIEC official came forward to address the concerns raised by the group.

The parties insist that if LASIEC does not reverse its decision and refund candidates who have already paid, they will proceed with legal action to defend democratic participation.

“The Fake Opposition Leader Mr. Peter Obi Is Not Opposed to the APC or Tinubu” – Sowore

“The Fake Opposition Leader Mr. Peter Obi Is Not Opposed to the APC or Tinubu” – Sowore

In a statement posted on his social media handle on Monday, prominent human rights activist and former presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), Omoyele Sowore, has accused Labour Party’s Peter Obi of colluding with the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

Sowore described Obi as a “fake opposition leader,” stating that the former Anambra State governor is not genuinely opposed to the APC or its leadership.

He stressed that Obi’s political actions are a calculated deception aimed at misleading the public, particularly his supporters, while working behind the scenes in alignment with the current administration.

“The Fake Opposition leader Mr. Peter Obi is not OPPOSED to the APC or Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, just deceiving the gullible and bullying those who know this fact. They’re all working together to keep you humble so that [they] could ride roughshod over you. #RevolutionNow,” Sowore wrote.

Sowore, known for his #RevolutionNow campaign and consistent criticism of government corruption and impunity, has often questioned the credibility of mainstream opposition figures, insisting that only a radical political overhaul can truly deliver change to Nigerians.

AAC, Take-It-Back Movement Condemn ₦500 Civil Service Application Fee in Bauchi, Demand Refund, Education Reform

AAC, Take-It-Back Movement Condemn ₦500 Civil Service Application Fee in Bauchi, Demand Refund, Education Reform

“Turning a recruitment exercise into a revenue-generating scheme is unacceptable. Job creation should prioritize empowering citizens, not depleting their limited resources,” the statement read.

The African Action Congress (AAC) and the Take-It-Back (TIB) Movement, Bauchi State Chapter, have jointly condemned the recent decision by the Bauchi State Government to impose a ₦500 application fee on unemployed youths applying for civil service jobs.

They both described the move as exploitative and insensitive, particularly amid the ongoing economic hardship faced by many Nigerians.

In a joint press statement released on Saturday, the party and the movement criticized the monetization of the recruitment process, arguing that job creation should serve to empower the people, not further impoverish them. They called for an immediate refund of all monies collected from applicants.

“Turning a recruitment exercise into a revenue-generating scheme is unacceptable. Job creation should prioritize empowering citizens, not depleting their limited resources,” the statement read.

The press release, signed by Amb. Umar Y Abubakar, Chairman of AAC in Bauchi State, and Comr. Nazif Nuhu, Coordinator of the TIB Movement, also drew attention to what they described as the “deplorable” state of public education in the state.

They lamented the deteriorating conditions of many schools, citing leaking roofs, overcrowded classrooms, and a lack of basic learning materials. The statement noted that Bauchi remains among the states with the highest number of out-of-school children since 2019, a situation the groups say demands urgent government intervention.

“We demand that the Bauchi State Government should redirect its focus and resources toward revitalizing our education system. Investing in rebuilding classrooms, training teachers, and creating a conducive learning environment is crucial,” the statement continued.

Summarizing their demands, the AAC and TIB Movement called on the state government to:

Cease what they termed “extortion” of job applicants,

Refund all application fees collected, and

Prioritize investment in the state’s education sector.

“The people of Bauchi deserve leadership that listens, cares, and acts in their best interest,” the statement concluded.

SEE THE FULL STATEMENT BELOW:

JOINT PRESS STATEMENT

BY

THE AFRICAN ACTION CONGRESS (AAC) AND THE TAKE-IT-BACK MOVEMENT (TIB), BAUCHI STATE CHAPTER

DATE: MAY 11, 2025

We, the African Action Congress (AAC) and the Take-It-Back Movement (TIB) in Bauchi State, express our utmost disapproval of the recent decision by the Bauchi State Government to impose a ₦500 application fee on unemployed youths seeking civil service positions. This move is not only exploitative but also disheartening, particularly given the current economic hardships faced by many citizens.

Turning a recruitment exercise into a revenue-generating scheme is unacceptable. Job creation should prioritize empowering citizens, not depleting their limited resources. We demand that the government immediately refunds all monies collected from applicants.

Furthermore, we are deeply concerned about the deplorable state of our public education system. Many schools in Bauchi are in disrepair, with leaking roofs, overcrowded classrooms, and inadequate learning materials. The state’s ranking among those with the highest number of out-of-school children since 2019 underscores the urgent need for reform.

We urge the Bauchi State Government to redirect its focus and resources toward revitalizing our education system. Investing in rebuilding classrooms, training teachers, and creating a conducive learning environment is crucial.

Our message is clear:

  • Cease the extortion
  • Refund applicants
  • Prioritize education

The people of Bauchi deserve leadership that listens, cares, and acts in their best interest.

E-SIGNED:

Amb. Umar Y Abubakar
Chairman, African Action Congress (AAC) Bauchi State Chapter

Comr. Nazif Nuhu
Coordinator, Take It Back Movement
Bauchi State Chapter

“Peter Obi’s Political Agenda Is ‘Another Corrupt Agenda in Disguise’”, Sowore

“Peter Obi’s Political Agenda Is ‘Another Corrupt Agenda in Disguise’”, Sowore

Human rights activist and former presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), Omoyele Sowore, has criticized Peter Obi’s stance on the protests against former President Goodluck Jonathan’s economic policies, describing it as “questionably dishonest” and even “outrightly DUMB.”

Sowore’s remarks, which were made in a recent statement on his social media handles, point to what he perceives as a contradiction in Obi’s approach to political protests and governance.

Sowore, an outspoken critic of Nigeria’s political leadership, raised significant concerns regarding Obi’s involvement in Jonathan’s administration and his apparent dismissal of protests against the latter’s policies. “He seems to imply that protests against Goodluck Jonathan’s economic policies were unnecessary, given his role as an ‘Economic Adviser’ in that administration. They were all supporting themselves by looting Nigeria dry, including the role of his Fidelity Bank assisting Diezani to move hard cold cash,” Sowore remarked.

The activist also questioned Obi’s current perspective on the regime of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, suggesting that if Obi believed protests were unwarranted under Jonathan, Tinubu’s handlers should adopt a similar stance. “If he believes protests are unwarranted under Goodluck Jonathan’s administration, why should Tinubu’s handlers not hold the same view? After all, they claim that their economic policies are for the good of Nigerians, even though our people are dying in droves, and they too have looted Nigeria dry in less than two years,” Sowore emphasized.

Sowore also pointed to Obi’s “Obidient” movement, which he said failed to take a stand on critical national issues, including the presidential election results and the #EndBadGovernance protests. He accused Obi and his movement of being inactive or complicit in the face of corruption, calling them “opportunists” who benefit from the struggles of others. “Notably, his Obidient movement did not protest the presidential election results, which they repeatedly claimed he won, nor did they participate in the #EndBadGovernance protests in 2024, claiming it was set up by ‘controlled opposition’,” Sowore stated.

He further criticized Obi for his silence during the fuel price hikes and his failure to oppose the Naira redesign policy, pointing out that Obi’s ally, former Central Bank Governor Godwin Emefiele, played a crucial role in the policy. “Even with the fuel price hikes he is speaking about here, there was not a time he ever led or encouraged Nigerians to oppose it,” Sowore added.

Sowore also called out Obi for his inability to initiate any meaningful action within his movement since its inception, accusing him of using the struggles of others for personal gain without taking any substantial steps to challenge systemic injustice. “Since the establishment of his GBAJUE ‘Obidient’ movement, not once has anything been done other than inaction or gaslighting other Nigerians, especially those who rightly didn’t support his political ambition/agenda,” Sowore noted. He claimed that Obi’s movement aimed to replace a corrupt set of politicians with his own “anointed set of corrupt opportunists,” some of whom have now returned to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

Drawing a parallel to the #EndSARS movement, Sowore warned that Obi, like other politicians, was hoping to benefit from the “sweat and blood of others” without lifting a finger to challenge the injustice faced by ordinary Nigerians. “Like #EndSARS, he, Peter Obi, is hoping to benefit from the sweat and blood of others without a finger raised to challenge injustice even against his own ‘Obidient’ movement members. OPPORTUNISTS!” Sowore concluded.

“Lagos Deserves Leaders Who Deliver, Not Those Who Take” – AAC Secretary Declares

“Lagos Deserves Leaders Who Deliver, Not Those Who Take” – AAC Secretary Declares

Jegede Kehinde, the Lagos State Secretary of the African Action Congress (AAC), took to his social media handle on Wednesday to criticize the political leaders who have held power in Lagos for over two decades, condemning them for poor leadership and their failure to meet the needs of the people.

He urged residents to stop supporting these politicians, whom he said have failed to provide basic services such as security, healthcare, and quality education.

“You should be angry enough to stop supporting your enemies,” Kehinde began in his passionate address. “You should be annoyed enough to stop singing praise of your slave master.”

He further admonished the support for leaders who, according to him, have failed to deliver on key responsibilities such as safety, education, and healthcare.

“You should be angry enough to stop supporting someone who couldn’t provide security, health care, sound education,” he stated. “Nothing should make you to support people that remove subsidies from every essential service you should have enjoy as a citizen.”

The AAC secretary also urged voters to break away from tribal sentiment when making political choices, advocating instead for issue-based support.

“Stop deceiving yourselves in the name of tribe. Go for persons that care about you,” he said.

Concluding his remarks, Kehinde took a direct swipe at the current political establishment in Lagos, saying: “Stop supporting a wasteful 25 years officeholders in the State.”